+高级检索
不同热塑性蜡基粘接剂对316L注射成型件性能的影响
作者:
作者单位:

合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院,合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院,合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院,合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院,合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院,合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院,合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院,合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院,合肥工业大学材料科学与工程学院

基金项目:

国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)


Effects of different thermoplastic wax-based binders on properties of 316L stainless steel injection molding parts
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China,School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China,School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China,School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China,School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China,School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China,School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China,School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China,School of Materials Science and Engineering,Hefei University of Technology;China

Fund Project:

Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2011ZE53059); National Natural Science Foundation of China (51275414); The Qualified Personnel Foundation of Taiyuan University of Technology (tyut-re201441a)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [19]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    用金属注射成型方法研究三种热塑性蜡基粘接剂(高密度聚乙烯、高密度聚乙烯/聚丙烯、聚丙烯)对316L不锈钢尺寸稳定性及其机械性能的影响,对三种热塑性蜡基粘接剂溶剂脱脂过程进行了分析。实验结果表明用高密度聚乙烯/聚丙烯热塑性蜡基粘接剂得到的316L不锈钢注射成型件尺寸稳定性及机械性能较好,溶剂脱脂时间较短、效果较好,其长、宽、高三维尺寸稳定性比聚丙烯热塑性蜡基粘接剂得到的注射成型件分别高46 %,40 %,20 %,密度、硬度和拉伸强度分别为7.28 g/cm3、72.3 HRB和579MPa。

    Abstract:

    A thorough of thermoplastic polymer in the wax-based binder is essential for ensuring the dimensions and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel metal injection molding parts. The effects of three thermoplastic polymers, High density polyethylene, High density polyethylene /Polypropylene and Polypropylene, on the dimensions and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel metal injection molding parts have been compared in this paper. The tensile bar is tested to examine the dimensions and mechanical properties of sintered parts against different thermoplastic polymers in the binder. Among the three thermoplastic polymers in the binder considered herein, High density polyethylene /Polypropylene performs better than the others in solvent debinding stage and in terms of the metal injection molding compact quality. High density polyethylene /Polypropylene has significantly better length, width and thickness by up to 46%, 40%, 20%, respectively. The density, hardness and tensile strength of the sintered parts are 7.28 g/cm3, 72.3 HRB and 579MPa.

    参考文献
    1Piotter V, Beck M, Plewa K et al. Metal Powder Report[J], 2009, 64(9): 35
    2Kukla Christian G. International Journal of Forming Processes[J], 2001, 4: 253
    3Li Yimin, Huang Boyun, Qu Xuanhui et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J],1996, 25: 3
    4Meng Junhu, Loh Ngiap Hiang,SFu Gang et al. Journal of the European Ceramic Society[J], 2011, 31(6): 1049
    5Huang Ming-Shyan, Hsu Hung-Chuan. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2009, 209(15-16), 5527
    6Kong X, Barriere T,SGelin J C. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2012, 212(11): 2173
    7Liu L, Loh N H, Tay B Y et al. Materials Characterization[J], 2005, 54(3): 230
    8Hwang K S, Tsou T H. Metallurgical transactions A[J], 1992, 23(10): 2775
    9Barriere Th, Liu B,SGelin J C. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2003, 143-144, 636
    10Huang M-S, Hsu H-C. Powder Metallurgy[J], 2011, 54(3): 299
    11Guo Shibo, Qu Xuanhui, Duan Bohua et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J],2005, 34: 1124
    12Chen G, Wen G, Edmonds N et al. Powder Metallurgy[J], 2015, 58(3): 220
    13Sotomayor M E,SVárez A, Levenfeld B. Powder Technology[J], 2010, 200(1-2): 30
    14Samanta S K, Chattopadhyay H, Godkhindi M M. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2011, 211(12): 2114
    15Yang Wei-Wen, Yang Kai-Yuan, Wang Moo-Chin et al. Ceramics international[J], 2003, 29(7), 745
    16Liu Xiang-quan, Li Yi-min, Yue Jian-ling et al. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China[J], 2008, 18(2): 278
    17Song J,SGelin J C, Barrière T et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2006, 177(1-3): 352
    18Fang Wei, He Xin-bo, Zhang Rui-jie et al. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China[J], 2015, 25(2): 552
    19Loh N H, Tor S B,SKhor K A. Journal of Materials Processing Technology[J], 2001, 108(3): 398
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

豆亚坤,凤仪,黄晓晨,汤海,丁冬冬,田沛,夏梦,钱刚,张学斌.不同热塑性蜡基粘接剂对316L注射成型件性能的影响[J].稀有金属材料与工程,2017,46(10):2775~2780.[Dou Ya-kun, Feng Yi, Huang Xiao-chen, Tang Hai, Ding Dong-dong, Tian Pei, Xia Meng, Qian Gang, Zhang Xue-bin. Effects of different thermoplastic wax-based binders on properties of 316L stainless steel injection molding parts[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering,2017,46(10):2775~2780.]
DOI:[doi]

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1480
  • 下载次数: 1565
  • HTML阅读次数: 168
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-07
  • 最后修改日期:2016-01-13
  • 录用日期:2016-01-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-12-01