1.南昌大学 物理与材料学院，江西 南昌 330031;2.中国航发北京航空材料研究院 中国航发失效分析中心，北京 100095;3.航空材料检测与评价北京市重点实验室，北京 100095;4.南昌航空大学 材料科学与工程学院，江西 南昌 330063
国家科技重大专项（J2019-VI-0003-0116）
- Ma Li 1,2,3
Ma Li
School of Physics and Materials, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;Failure Analysis Center of Aero Engine Corporation of China, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Aeronautical Materials Testing and Evaluation, Beijing 100095, China
在期刊界中查找
在百度中查找
在本站中查找 - Wei Zhenwei 2,3
- Zhou Jie 1
- Li Leyu 1,2,3
Li Leyu
School of Physics and Materials, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;Failure Analysis Center of Aero Engine Corporation of China, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Aeronautical Materials Testing and Evaluation, Beijing 100095, China
在期刊界中查找
在百度中查找
在本站中查找 - Deng Zhiwei 1,2,3
Deng Zhiwei
School of Physics and Materials, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;Failure Analysis Center of Aero Engine Corporation of China, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Aeronautical Materials Testing and Evaluation, Beijing 100095, China
在期刊界中查找
在百度中查找
在本站中查找 - Fan Hao 2,3,4
Fan Hao
Failure Analysis Center of Aero Engine Corporation of China, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Aeronautical Materials Testing and Evaluation, Beijing 100095, China;College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
在期刊界中查找
在百度中查找
在本站中查找 - Peng Wenyi 1
- Liu Changkui 2,3
1.School of Physics and Materials, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;2.Failure Analysis Center of Aero Engine Corporation of China, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China;3.Beijing Key Laboratory of Aeronautical Materials Testing and Evaluation, Beijing 100095, China;4.College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
National Science and Technology Major Project (J2019-VI-0003-0116)
- 摘要 | |
- 访问统计 |
- 参考文献 [32] |
- 相似文献 [20] | | |
- 文章评论
固溶处理是常见的提升7050铝合金综合性能的热处理手段，但由于7050合金存在一定的淬火敏感性，淬火水温是影响其性能的一个重要因素，不同的淬火水温会影响合金获得的固溶体饱和度和析出相尺寸，进而影响合金性能。研究了固溶处理时，冷却水温度对7050铝合金组织性能的影响。结果表明，随着淬火水温的升高，通过EBSD分析得出合金的大角度晶界比例逐渐提升，位错主要集中在大角度晶界和晶界密集的区域，合金中晶界处不断产生析出相并长大，合金硬度呈现先增加后降低的趋势，耐腐蚀性能随着淬火水温的升高持续变差。50 ℃水温淬火时合金具有良好的综合性能，显微硬度为1707.16 MPa，腐蚀电位为?0.927 V。
Solution treatment is a common heat treatment to improve the comprehensive properties of 7050 aluminum alloys. Due to the quenching sensitivity of 7050 alloy, the water quenching temperature is an important factor affecting its performance. Different water quenching temperatures affect the saturation of solid solution obtained consequently and the size of precipitated phases, which in turn affects the properties of the alloy. The effect of water quenching temperature on the microstructure and properties of 7050 aluminum alloy during solution treatment was investigated. Results show that with increasing the water quenching temperature, the fraction of high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) in the alloy increases according to the EBSD analysis; dislocations are mainly concentrated in HAGBs and areas with dense grain boundaries (GBs); the precipitated phase of the alloy continuously forms and grows at the GBs; the hardness of the alloy shows a trend of increasing first and then decreasing; the corrosion resistance deteriorates as the water quenching temperature increases. The alloy shows excellent comprehensive properties when quenched in water at 50 °C, with a microhardness of 1707.16 MPa and a corrosion potential of ?0.927 V.
引用本文
马力,魏振伟,周杰,李乐宇,邓志伟,范浩,彭文屹,刘昌奎.淬火水温对
DOI：10.12442/j. issn.1002-185X.20230510
文章指标
- 点击次数:339
- 下载次数: 518
- HTML阅读次数: 45
历史
- 收稿日期:2023-08-18
- 最后修改日期:2024-04-11
- 录用日期:2023-10-07
- 在线发布日期: 2024-05-27
- 出版日期: 2024-05-22