+高级检索
网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Effect of Ba-Nd Composite Modification on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg-3Si-4Zn Cast Alloy  PDF

  • Tong Wenhui 1
  • Zhao Chenxi 1
  • Tong Fangze 3
  • Cai Qian 2
  • Huang Bonan 1
  • Wang Jie 1
  • Liu Yunyi 1
1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, China; 2. Shenyang Yuchengxin Technology Service for Achievement Transformation Co., Ltd, Shenyang 110004, China; 3. Murray Edwards College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0DF, UK

Updated:2023-01-10

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CN CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

The effects of Ba-Nd composite modification on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-3Si-4Zn cast alloy were investigated. The microstructure was characterized by OM, SEM, EDS and XRD. The mechanical properties were tested by hardness test. The best modification effect was achieved when a single denaturant Ba of 1.2wt% was added to the Mg-3Si-4Zn alloy. Results show that the formed phase BaMg2Si2 can act as a heterogeneous nucleation core for the primary Mg2Si, refining the primary Mg2Si. Ba-Nd composite modification is achieved by adding the modifier Nd to the Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba alloy. By the calculation of the Gibbs free energy using the Miedema model and a linear fit, it is found that the growth rate of primary Mg2Si is suppressed and the primary Mg2Si phase in the microstructure becomes smaller because more stable compounds like NdSi, NdSi2, Ba2Si, and BaSi2 can be formed by Nd and/or Ba atoms with Si atoms, preventing Si atoms from binding to Mg atoms at the initial stage of solidification. The best Ba-Nd composite modification effect is achieved when the Nd content is 2.0wt%, i.e. the primary Mg2Si changes from a dendritic shape with an average area of about 600 μm2 to a nearly square-shape with an average side length of about 5 μm and the eutectic Mg2Si changes from complex and coarse Chinese-script shape with an average area of about 444 μm2 to simpler shape with a mean area of about 89 μm2. The hardness of the alloy is increased from 575.75 MPa to 612.11 MPa, increased by 6.31%.

Science Press

  

Magnesium alloy is a lightweight metallic material with excellent specific strength and stiffness, damping and shock absorption, etc. These properties give the magnesium alloy a versatile role in automotive and aerospace industries[

1-3]. It can be used to manufacture products, such as vehicle seat frames, bodywork, engine block, gear shell, fairing, wingtip, owing to its lightweight[4,5]. Its application potential in these fields is of significant research value.

Magnesium has low strength and low ductility because of its hexagonal close-packed (hcp) crystal structure; therefore, it has been alloyed with other substances to produce many metallic materials with outstanding properties. However, these magnesium alloys are not perfect and their properties can be further improved by adding other substances. At first, adding Al is a strengthening method since the high solubility of Al in magnesium can obtain the outstanding engineering properties (such as tensile strength, elongation) at room temperature in applications. Despite all these benefits, the instability of the reinforcing phase Mg17Al12 in the alloys destroys the mechanical properties (ultimate tensile strength, tensile yield strength, creep resistance, tensile and compressive creep, etc) at high temperatures, resulting in softening of the alloys beyond 125 °C[

6,7]. Moreover, the increasing demands for heat resistant magnesium alloys make the poor high-temperature stability of the Mg17Al12 phase a more noticeable problem[8]. As a result, the application of the magnesium alloy strengthened with Al is restricted severely[9].

Therefore, other alloying elements that can strengthen the alloy without causing the instability of reinforcing phases are proposed, such as rare earth (RE), argentum (Ag), thorium (Th) and silicon (Si)[

10-13]. Many studies have shown that adding alloying elements of RE, Ag and Th to magnesium alloys can improve the high-temperature properties (high-temperature tensile strength, creep resistance) of the alloys effectively[10-12]. For example, WE 54 and WE 43 magnesium alloys strengthened with RE were developed which can work at 250~300 °C[14,15]. But these alloying elements are relatively expensive for commercial applications. In contrast, the ele-ment Si is very cheap and the intermetallic compound Mg2Si formed in the alloys has been widely used to strengthen the aluminum alloys[16,17]. The phase of Mg2Si obtained by adding Si elements to magnesium alloys avoids the aforementioned problems since it is a reinforcing phase with a high melting point, high hardness, low density, low expansion, and high elastic modulus[18,19]. These advantageous features make the modification effect of Mg2Si on magnesium alloys promising in application. Although the instability of magnesium alloy at high temperatures is tackled by adding Si, the strengthening effect of Mg2Si at room temperature is suppressed since the coarse dendritic-shaped primary Mg2Si and the complex Chinese-script-shaped eutectic Mg2Si can split the alloy matrix. The disturbing primary and eutectic phases of Mg2Si are results of the facet growth of Mg2Si and the non-equilib-rium characteristics during the solidification of magnesium alloy in the standard casting process[20-22]. As a result, the room-temperature properties, especially the tensile strength and elongation, will decline significantly due to the fragmented magnesium alloy matrix by the Mg2Si phase with angular morphologies. Refining the size and the morphologies of the primary and eutectic Mg2Si phases becomes a critical issue.

There are many methods to refine Mg2Si, such as heat treatment, hot extrusion and ageing, friction stirring process (FSP) and mechanical ball milling[

23-26]. Studies are also conducted to assess the effects of modified melt procedures on refining Mg2Si phases. Hot extrusion or friction stirring is limited because of the poor ductility of the magnesium alloy with high Si content. There are only minor effects of heat treatment on the eutectic Mg2Si and scarce effects on the primary Mg2Si[23].

Current studies on refining the structure of Mg2Si also emphasize on modifying the alloy melt. Modification is a method of refining alloys' microstructure by adding some elements, which can be attached to the surface of the solidified crystals to prevent the growth of these crystals. Alternatively, substances that can disperse uniformly into the alloy melt as solidified nuclei to promote nucleation can also be added. Modification treatment is less expensive, easier to operate, and more effective compared with the above methods. Adding modifier elements such as calcium (Ca), yttrium (Y), strontium (Sr), cerium (Ce), gadolinium (Gd), neodymium (Nd), barium (Ba), stibium (Sb), tin (Sn) to the magnesium alloy to react with Si element can change the morphologies of both primary and eutectic Mg2Si phase so as to improve the mechanical properties[

21,27-34].

Moussa et al[

27] found that adding 0.3wt% Ca to Mg-5Si alloy can effectively reduce the average size of the primary Mg2Si in the alloy to about 50 μm and transform the phase morphology to polyhedral. This is due to the segregation and “poisoning” of calcium atoms in the alloy[35]. However, excessive addition of calcium results in the formation of massive, needle-like CaMgSi particles, which will destroy the continuity of the alloy matrix. As a result, the modification effect of Mg2Si is weakened and the alloy properties are degraded. Sb atoms can achieve a similar outcome. Two mechanisms are responsible for it. One is that free Sb atoms can occupy the surface of Mg2Si crystal and their “poisoning” effect can effectively decrease the size of the primary Mg2Si. The other involves heterogeneous nucleation of Mg3Sb2. This phase is stable and can act as a nucleus for Mg2Si particle growth. Xiao et al[33] demonstrated this by adding 2.0wt% Sb to the magnesium alloy. It turned out that the average size of the primary phase of Mg2Si was reduced from 71 μm to 18 μm and the phase morphology transformed from coarse dendrites to massive octahedral. In addition, the intrinsic hardness of Mg2Si modified by Sb was increased by 36.6% (from 4.21 GPa to 5.75 GPa), and the compressive strength increased from 386 MPa to 415 MPa with an increase in the compressive strain from 14.1% to 16.5%.

Eutectic Mg2Si can also be modified and Zhang et al[

36] found that the coarse Chinese-script-shaped eutectic Mg2Si in the microstructure can be turned to fine particles by adding Al-P intermediate alloy to AZ91-0.7%Si alloy. Modification effect on eutectic Mg2Si is realized via various mechanisms. Han et al[37] suggested that adsorption and doping of Nd atoms in the (100) surface in the magnesium alloys permit the modification of the eutectic Mg2Si phase. In contrast, Ghandvar et al[32] found a different mechanism, i.e. the Al4Ba compound obtained by adding Ba element to the Al-Mg-Si melt can act as a heterogeneous nucleation core for the primary Mg2Si phase and the growth of Mg2Si in the {100} surfaces is inhibited.

However, the majority of existing studies on the modification treatment of Mg2Si in Al-free magnesium alloys tend to emphasize either the primary phase or the eutectic phase. Although Chen et al[

38] did suggest that addition of 1wt% Ba can effectively refine the primary Mg2Si phase in the microstructure and reduce the amount of eutectic Mg2Si phase particles, relevant studies are scarce and superficial, lacking excellent modification effect on both phases. Based on these, our study proposed a new composite modification of Ba-Nd, and investigated the modification effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties of high-silicon, Al-free magnesium alloys. The results indicated that Ba-Nd is capable of refining both primary and eutectic phases of Mg2Si and hence yields excellent mechanical properties.

1 Experiment

1.1 Materials and processing

Commercially pure magnesium (purity≥99.6%) and zinc (purity≥99.5%), Mg-35.2Si master alloy, Mg-10Ba master alloy and Mg-30Nd master alloy were used as raw materials to prepare the investigated samples of magnesium alloys. All ingredient metals and alloys were calculated and cut according to the chemical composition shown in Table 1. All the materials were preheated to 200 °C and dried. The melting process of the alloy was carried out in a gas-controlled well resistance furnace (SG-7.5-12, 7.5 kW). When the internal temperature reached 500 °C, dried pure magnesium was added into a mild steel crucible (diameter=80 mm, height=250 mm), placed inside the furnace and melted under the protection of mixed SF6 and CO2 (0.5:100) gases. The furnace was heated continuously to 750 °C and kept until the pure magnesium was completely melted. Then, when the furnace temperature was increased to 790 °C, the Mg-Si master alloy was added three times and the interval time was about 1 h. After the Mg-Si alloy was added every time, the melt was stirred with a stirring bar for 3~5 min for the composition uniformity of the melt and melting efficiency. Pure zinc, Mg-Ba master alloy and Mg-Nd master alloy were added into the melt in turn after complete melting and surface slag removing, stirred for 5 min and then rested for 5 min. Consequently, the prepared melt was cast into graphite mold (diameter=50 mm, height=130 mm) protected by the mixed gas of SF6 and CO2.

Table 1  Chemical composition of Mg-3Si-4Zn-xBa-yNd alloys (wt%)
Alloy No.ZnSiBaNdMg
1 4 3 0 0 Bal.
2 4 3 0.8 0 Bal.
3 4 3 1.0 0 Bal.
4 4 3 1.2 0 Bal.
5 4 3 1.5 0 Bal.
6 4 3 1.2 0.8 Bal.
7 4 3 1.2 1.0 Bal.
8 4 3 1.2 1.5 Bal.
9 4 3 1.2 2.0 Bal.

1.2 Materials characterization

The metallographic specimens were cut from the prepared magnesium alloy samples at the height of 1/3 from the sample bottom and the radius of 1/2 from its axial centre, as seen in Fig.1. The solidification microstructure was observed by opti-cal microscope (OM, Olympus GX71) and the metallographic photos were taken after the specimens were ground and polished. The morphology and microscopic composition of the precipitated phase in the microstructure of the alloy were investigated by scanning electric microscopy (SEM, JSM-6700) equipped with energy dispersive spec-troscopy (EDS). The phase composition of the alloys was measured by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, Smartlab) with a diffraction angle from 20° to 90° and a scanning speed of 1°/min to identify the phases in the alloy. The modification mechanism of the alloy melt and its solidification were revealed in combination with optical metallographic microstructure.

Fig.1  Schematic diagram of cutting metallographic sample: (a) cast sample and (b) cutting sample for metallography and hardness measuring

1.3 Hardness measuring

The hardness of the alloy specimens was tested using a microhardness tester (DPHV-1000 type) under the testing pressure of 0.98 N and the loading time of 15 s. Six measuring positions were located at the radius of 1/2 from the axial centre of the above cylindrical specimens, which were evenly distributed on the circumstance, as seen from Fig.1b. The data obtained were averaged as the hardness of this specimen except the minimum and maximum.

2 Results

2.1 Modification of single modifier Ba

Based on our results, the size of both primary and eutectic Mg2Si decreases as the Ba modifier content increases. As shown in Fig.2 and Fig.3, the exact size of primary Mg2Si decreases from approximately 600 μm2 (40 μm×15 μm) to 178 μm2 (13.3 μm×13.3 μm), while that of the eutectic Mg2Si is reduced from 444 μm2 to 67 μm2. However, this effect is lost and reversed when the Ba content exceeds 1.2wt%. In addi-tion, the Ba modifier also refines the morphology of both Mg2Si phases. The shape of the primary Mg2Si phase is transformed from a dendritic shape (Fig.2a) to an approxi-mately square shape (Fig.2d). In contrast, the eutectic phase is changed from a complex and coarse Chinese-script shape to a simpler shape (at the upper right corner of Fig.2a and 2d). The best modification effects on both phases occur when the content of Ba reaches 1.2wt%. In the following test of the hardness of the refined alloys, alloys with 1.2wt% Ba shows the greatest hardness (739.41 MPa) in Fig.4, exhibiting an increase of 28.4% compared with alloy without the Ba modifier (575.75 MPa).

Fig.2  Metallographic microstructures of Mg-3Si-4Zn alloy with different Ba contents: (a) 0wt%, (b) 0.8wt%, (c) 1.0wt%, (d) 1.2wt%, and (e) 1.5wt% (white arrow indicates primary Mg2Si with block shape; with increasing the Ba content, the primary phase shape changes from dendritic and hollow polygonal block to fine block and then restores hollow polygonal block)

Fig.3  Average area of primary Mg2Si grains and eutectic Mg2Si with different Ba contents

Fig.4  Average hardness values of Mg-3Si-4Zn alloy with different Ba contents

2.2 Composite modification of Ba-Nd

Given that the optimal Ba content is 1.2wt% when the Ba is used as the only modifier, the composite modification of Ba-Nd is assessed by adding Nd (0.8wt%, 1.0wt%, 1.5wt%, 2.0wt%) to Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba alloy. Again, metallographic micro-graphs of Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba-xNd alloys are obtained to assess the size and morphology of the Mg2Si particle (Fig.5).

Fig.5  Microstructures of Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba-xNd with different Nd contents: (a) 0wt%, (b) 1.0wt%, (c) 1.5wt%, and (d) 2.0wt%

The size of both Mg2Si phases further decreases upon the addition of Nd and the optimal effect appears when the Nd content reaches 2.0wt%. Under this experiment condition, the primary Mg2Si particles are almost invisible in the microstructure (Fig. 5d). In this case, primary Mg2Si becomes tiny blocks with an average area of about 25 μm2 (5 μm×5 μm as shown in Fig.6). Similarly, the size of eutectic Mg2Si also decreases (Fig.7) from 356 μm2 to about 89 μm2. Although this is slightly larger than that in alloys with Ba modifier alone (1.2wt%), the size is still significantly reduced. As described above, the composite modification effects of Ba-Nd are best at the Nd content of 2.0wt% and the Ba content of 1.2wt%.

Fig.6  SEM image (a) and EDS results (b) of Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba-2.0Nd (A presents fine needle-like and hollow ring-like phases discussed at Section 3.2)

Fig.7  Variation of average area of eutectic Mg2Si with different Nd contents

The hardness of Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba-xNd (x=0.8, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0) is also assessed and the hardness decreases when the Nd content is below 1.5wt% and increases afterwards, as shown in Fig.8.

Fig.8  Average hardness values of Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba alloy with different Nd contents

3 Discussion

3.1 Modification mechanism of Ba

From the above experimental results, we can see that the modification of only adding Ba to the high Si magnesium alloy is different from the composite modification of Ba-Nd. To reveal the modification mechanism, XRD analyses were performed and the results are shown in Fig.9.

Fig.9  XRD results of Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba alloy with different Nd contents

From Fig.9, when Ba is the only modifier, Ba-Si inter-metallic phases arise in addition to Mg2Si phases. Then Fig.10a indicates that the phases of BaMg2Si2 (marked as B) grow coherently with Mg2Si phase, because the needle-shaped BaMg2Si2 phase grows together with the block of Mg2Si phase. With these facts identified, it can be concluded that Ba refines the size of Mg2Si phases, because the BaMg2Si2 particles can act as a heterogeneous nucleation core for the primary Mg2Si.

Fig.10  SEM image (a) and EDS results of the point B marked in Fig.10a (b) of Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba alloy

The BaMg2Si2 particles make the growth of Mg2Si phases easier; hence more Si atoms are consumed at the early stage of solidification under non-equilibrium solidification conditions. As a result, the Si content in the remaining liquid phase is much lower than that in the Mg-Si eutectic phase and the amount of the eutectic Mg2Si generated is reduced. However, if the Ba content increases beyond the optimum, the agglomerative growth of BaMg2Si2 weakens the modification effect. The underlying mechanism is that the BaMg2Si2 grows into a needle-shaped phase as the Ba content increases. These BaMg2Si2 phases can no longer be heterogeneous nucleation cores and the modification effects are weakened[

38].

3.2 Modification mechanism of Ba and Nd

After Nd is added to the Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba magnesium alloy, the XRD results indicate that the BaMg2Si2 phases disappear and Ba2Si, BaSi2, NdSi and NdSi2 phases emerge seen from Fig.9. As shown in SEM image, many fine needle-like and hollow ring-like phases are found (indicated by A in Fig.6). Results of line scanning for the phases in Fig.11 suggest that their main components are Si, Ba and Nd, but no Mg. Therefore, they may be different sections for the same compound. If this XRD result and the Ba-Si, Nd-Si, Ba-Nd phase diagrams[

39] (Fig.12) are considered together, it can be demonstrated that the compounds are Ba2Si, BaSi2, NdSi and NdSi2 by comparing the element distribution of Mg, Si, Ba and Nd. Because of the enrichment of Si (Fig.11d), Ba (Fig.11e) and Nb (Fig.11f) of needle-like or ring-like phases and the lack of Mg element (Fig.11c), compounds of Ba-Si and Nd-Si always ap-pear together.

Fig.11  SEM images (a, b) and EDS line scan results along line marked in Fig.11b (c~f) of Mg-3Si-4Zn-1.2Ba-2.0Nd

Fig.12  Phase diagram of binary alloy of Nd-Si (a), Ba-Si (b) and Ba-Nd (c)[

39]

According to the Miedema model[

40], the mixing enthalpy of the binary alloy can be expressed as:

ΔHmix=xAfBAΔHsolA in B (1)

where ΔHsolA in B is the heat of dissolution of element A into element B, which can be calculated by Eq.(2); fBA is the ratio of A atoms surrounded by B atoms, which can be calculated by Eq.(3).

ΔHsolA in B=2pVa2/3[1+μAxB(ΦA*-ΦB*)]                ×qp(Δnws1/3)2-(ΔΦ*)2-Rp(nws1/3)A-1+(nws1/3)B-1 (2)
fBA=xBsxBs[1+8(xAsxBs)2] (3)

in which Φ* is the electronegativity parameter of element; nws1/3 is the average electron densities of element at the Wigner-seitz cell boundary, whose subscript A and B represent element A and B, respectively; μ, q, R and p are empirical parameters, q/p=9.4, and the parameter μ takes different values depending on the atomic valence of the element[

40-42]; xAs and xBs are the surface concentrations of atom A and B, respectively, calculated as follows:

xBs=xAVA2/3xAVA2/3+xBVB2/3xBs=xBVB2/3xAVA2/3+xBVB2/3 (4)

In Eq.(4), VA and VB are the atomic molar volumes of element A and B in their alloy, respectively, calculated by Eq.(5).

VA2/3=Va2/3[1+μAxB(ΦA*-ΦB*)]VB2/3=Vb2/3[1+μBxA(ΦB*-ΦA*)] (5)

where Va and Vb denote the atomic molar volumes of the pure element A and B, respectively.

So, the mixing enthalpy of the disordered binary alloys and ordered alloys can be calculated by Eq.(6) and Eq.(7), respectively, which are obtained by substituting Eq.(2)~(5) into Eq.(1).

ΔHmix=ΛABxAVA2/3xBVB2/3xAVA2/3+xBVB2/3 (6)
ΔHmixorder=ΔHmix                   ×1+8ΔHmixΛABxAVA2/3+xBVB2/32 (7)
ΛAB=2pqpΔnws1/32-(Δϕ*)2-Rpnws1/3A-1+nws1/3B-1 (8)

The relationship between the excess Gibbs free energy ΔGABE, the excess entropy ΔSABE and the heat generation ΔHmix of the binary alloy is as follows:

ΔGABE=ΔHmix-TΔSABE (9)

where T is the absolute temperature of the system (K). Eq.(10) can be got assuming ΔSABE0 since ΔSABEΔHmix.

ΔGABE=ΔHmix (10)

So, the partial molar excess Gibbs energy ΔGAE and ΔGBE can be calculated using Eq.(11) and Eq.(12), respectively.

ΔGAE=RTlnγA=ΔGABE+xBΔGABExA (11)
ΔGBE=RTlnγB=ΔGABE-(1-xB)ΔGABExA (12)

The element activity in the alloy melt is then

αi=γixi (13)

where γ is the activity coefficient of the element, and α the element activity, whose subscript i is A or B.

When AmBn phase begins to precipitate from the A-B binary alloy melt at Ti, near the liquidus at the alloy composition ci, m[A]+n[B]=AmBn (s) reaction occurs, and its change in the Gibbs free energy (ΔGTiθ) can be calculated by the following relationship [

43].

ΔGTiθ=RTiln(αAmαBn) (14)

The relationship between ΔGTiθ and Ti is shown in Fig.13, calculated with scatter of Eq.(14), and it can be described by Eq.(15) fitted using Origin software.

ΔGTθ=u+wT (15)

where u and w are the fitting constants.

The Gibbs free energy of the Mg2Si phase precipitation reaction is calculated and shown in Fig.13 by selecting seven temperatures Ti in the range of 1023 K to 1323 K from the Mg-Si binary phase diagram, corresponding to the alloy composition ci. Fitting these scattered points in Fig.13, Eq.(16) is obtained for the Mg2Si precipitation reaction.

(ΔGθ)Mg2Si=86976.48132-115.889T (16)

Similarly, Eq.(17) in the temperature range from 1873 K to 1973 K and Eq.(18) in the temperature range from 1273 K to 1873 K are obtained for the Gibbs free energy of the precipitation reaction of the NdSi2 phase and NdSi phase, respectively. Eq.(19) in the temperature range of 1123~1223 K and Eq.(20) in the temperature range of 913~993 K are obtained for the Gibbs free energy of the precipitation reaction of the BaSi2 phase and Ba2Si phase, respectively.

(ΔGθ)NdSi2=-58879.86713-27.6681T (17)
(ΔGθ)NdSi=8900.34385-43.25617T (18)
(ΔGθ)BaSi2=262828.20198-349.1423T (19)
(ΔGθ)Ba2Si=116814.13053-189.874127T (20)

In the system of the molten Mg-3Si-4Zn alloy with Nd content of 2.0wt% or/and Ba content of 1.2wt%, ΔGθ of forming Ba2Si, BaSi2, NdSi, and NdSi2 compounds are calculated and their relative stability is compared with each other. However, the alloy melting point temperature Tm can be calculated by the following formula[

44] because the alloy melt is dilute solution, presuming that the alloy solidifies and crystallizes at the temperature of Tm.

Tm=i=1nci(Tm)i (21)

where (Tm)i is the melting point temperature of the alloy component i.

According to Eq.(16)~(20), the Gibbs free energy of forming Mg2Si, Ba2Si, BaSi2, NdSi, and NdSi2 in the alloy melt are obtained at Tm=941 K which is -22.08, -61.86, -65.71, -31.80 and -84.92 kJ mol-1, respectively. According to thermody-namic knowledge, the larger the absolute value of the Gibbs free energy, the easier the reaction to proceed and the more stable the resulting compound. Therefore, NdSi2 is the most stable compound, followed by BaSi2, Ba2Si, and NdSi, all of which are more stable than Mg2Si. Therefore, when Ba and Nd are present in the magnesium alloy melt as modifiers, Si atoms originally bound to the Mg in the melt preferentially bond with Nd and Ba during solidification.

When the Nd content is low, the microstructural morphology of Mg2Si exhibits minor difference from that of alloy with the single Ba modifier (as shown in Fig.5a and Fig.2d), because Nd has a high solubility (3.6%) in the magnesium matrix[

45]. However, if the Nd content (Fig.5b~5d) increases in the magnesium matrix, Nd atoms will precipitate and interact with other atoms. As a result, primary Mg2Si in the alloy gradually decreases in size and ultimately “disappears” at the Nd content of 2.0wt%.

According to the above calculated results of free energy and stability order of those compounds, it can be deduced that when Nd is present in the melt, Si atoms will firstly bond to Nd anywhere in the melt and give arise to the NdSi2 phases during the solidification of the alloy melt. As the process proceeds, free Nd atoms decrease rapidly and dramatically. The chemical potential of Nd in the melt decreases sharply and the forming Gibbs free energy change GΘ of the reaction between Nd and Si increases obviously. When it is higher than that of the reaction between Ba and Si, Ba atoms bond to Si atoms instead of the reaction of Nd and Si. As the reaction proceeds, the Gibbs free energy GΘ for the reaction of Ba and Si increases, and Nd and Si recombine to form NdSi instead of Ba and Si. Similarly, the Gibbs free energy GΘ for the reaction of Nd and Si continues to increase, and Mg atoms begin to combine with Si atoms instead of Nd and Si. So, the formed intermetallic compounds of Nd-Si will be dispersed uniformly with the short needle shape because of the strong combining ability (the highest stability of the intermetallic compound) between Nd and Si atoms and the short reaction time. As the temperature decreases, the peritectic reactions, such as L+NdSi→Nd5Si4, L+Nd5Si4→Nd5Si3, will take place according to the phase diagram of Nd-Si (as seen in Fig.12a). But these reactions do not occur because Nd5Si4, Nd5Si3, etc are not found in Fig.9b and Fig.9c. So, the Nd-Si intermetallic compounds are stable in the melt when the reaction of Ba and Si begins. According to the phase diagram of Ba-Nd (as seen in Fig.12c), Ba and Nd have a greater mutual solubility at high temperature, but no any intermetallic compounds form. It is easier to form Ba-Si compounds attached to the Nd-Si intermetallic compound as seen from Fig.11d~11f. These reactions consume a large number of Si atoms. It is the “robbery” of Si atoms by Nd and Ba atoms, which causes insufficient Si atoms during the growth of primary Mg2Si and restricts the development of primary Mg2Si in a preferential direction of {100}. These further contribute to the uniform distribution of the Mg2Si with a tiny squared shape in the alloy matrix.

The modification mechanism of Ba-Nd composite on eutectic Mg2Si has been revealed by the previous research. Han et al[

37] suggested that the main mechanism of Nd modification on the eutectic Mg2Si phase in magnesium alloys may be the surface adsorption, by which Nd atoms are preferentially adsorbed to the vacant sites on the {100} surface of eutectic Mg2Si, but not the H2 sites on the {111} surface. This is because the adsorption energy of rare-earth Nd atoms on the {100} surface of Mg2Si is much smaller than that on the {111} surface. The crystal growth of the {100} preferential growth surface of Mg2Si is inhibited by the covering of the easily absorbed rare-earth Nd atoms on the {100} surface. Moreover, Nd atoms have a strong doping effect on the {100} surface of Mg2Si, which is justified by calculating the doping and adsorption properties of Nd on the Mg2Si surfaces of {100} and {111} using the first-principles approach[37]. The two factors of doping and adsorption of Nd on the {100} surface of eutectic Mg2Si reduce the average area of Mg2Si. The composite modifier Ba-Nd can also reduce the size and quantity of eutectic Mg2Si, as discussed in the Section 3.1.

To sum up, the size and morphology of the primary and eutectic Mg2Si can be changed effectively by the composite modification of Ba-Nd.

3.3 Role of Mg2Si phase on the alloy hardness

The highest hardness of the alloy containing Nd does not appear at the Nd content of 2.0wt% (612.11 MPa), but it appears when the Nd content reaches 0.8wt% at the Ba content of 1.2wt%. The alloy hardness decreases with increasing the Nd content, reaching the lowest value (575.75 MPa) at the Nd content of 1.5wt% in the experiments. Afterwards, hardness begins to increase. Microstructural analyses were performed and the changes of the size and the number of the primary Mg2Si and eutectic Mg2Si are schematically shown in Fig.14. The size and the number of the primary Mg2Si phases decrease, while the size of the eutectic Mg2Si decreases and the number increases as the Nd content increases. When the Nd content is low, primary Mg2Si plays an important role in measuring the hardness because the indenter of hardness tester has a greater possibility to be pressed due to its large size. However, when the Nd content increases, the contribution of the primary phase to the alloy hardness decreases and that of the eutectic phase increases. The alloy hardness decreases until the contribution of the eutectic phase is dominant.

Fig.14  Schematic diagram of changes of size and distribution of the primary and eutectic Mg2Si in the alloy microstructure with Nd content at the Ba content of 1.2wt% according to Fig.5: (a) coarsening of primary Mg2Si and sparse eutectic Mg2Si, (b) decrease of primary Mg2Si size and increase of eutectic Mg2Si, and (c) disappearing of primary Mg2Si and increased distributed eutectic Mg2Si

3.4 Properties and application of high Si magnesium alloy after Ba-Nd composite modification

As mentioned before, it is very difficult to obtain the alloy microstructure with fine particles and uniform dispersion of Mg2Si, especially when the Si content is high. Many studies showed that the size of primary Mg2Si decreases and its morphology changes from coarsen dendritic shape to small block shape, but the size is almost always greater than 15 μm and the shape is sharp. But in this experiment, as shown in Fig.5d and Fig.6a, primary Mg2Si becomes tiny blocks with an average area of about 25 μm2 (5 μm×5 μm) and the size of eutectic Mg2Si decreases (Fig.7) to about 89 μm2 by adding 1.2wt% Ba and 2.0wt% Nd.

According to the relationship between microstructure and properties, the microstructure of the alloy will determine its outstanding room-temperature properties in spite that its hardness is not the highest. This is consistent with the good high-temperature properties of the alloy (the room-temperature and high-temperature properties will be reported in the future). Tiny particles of primary Mg2Si will enhance the room-temperature tensile strength of the alloy compared with the coarsen Mg2Si dendrite, since the pinning dislocation prevents it from moving. At the same time, ductility of the alloy also increases due to the fine crystals of Mg2Si. At elevated temperatures, these fine particles of Mg2Si can also prevent the alloy matrix crystal boundaries from travelling and this improves creep resistance and high-temperature strength. Overall, the high Si magnesium alloys after composite modification may develop good comprehensive mechanical properties at both room temperature and high temperature.

The high Si magnesium alloys are more prone to deformation after Ba-Nd composite modification because of the improved ductility. Deformation of the alloys will crush the matrix crystal grains and the tiny particles of Mg2Si into smaller pieces. As a result, it is possible to achieve a magnesium matrix composites with uniformly dispersed tiny Mg2Si particles, which are reinforced and can be deformed easily.

4 Conclusions

1) The best modification effect can be achieved by adding 1.2wt% Ba to the Mg-3Si-4Zn alloy melt, with the primary Mg2Si changing from dendrites with an average area of about 600 μm2 (40 μm×15 μm) to nearly square with an average area of about 178 μm2 (13.3 μm×13.3 μm). The eutectic Mg2Si with Chinese-script shape is changed from complex and coarse with an average area of about 444 μm2 to a simple dotted-line with area of about 67 μm2. The hardness value of the alloy is increased by 28.4% from 575.75 MPa to 739.41 MPa. However, when the Ba content is greater than 1.2wt%, the mechanical properties of the alloy are limited by excessive modification due to the generation of excessive needle-like BaMg2Si2.

2) At the optimal Ba content of 1.2wt%, the size of primary Mg2Si in the microstructure gradually decreases with an increase in the Nd content, and the eutectic Mg2Si with the Chinese-script shape is changed from complex with the average area of about 356 μm2 to simple with a mean area of about 89 μm2. The best modification effects are achieved, in which the primary Mg2Si is changed into the tiny square block shape with the length of about 5 μm when the compound modifier has a Ba content of 1.2wt% and an Nd content of 2.0wt%. Under the composite modification, the hardness value of the alloy increases from 575.75 MPa to 612.11 MPa, increased by 6.31%.

3) When Ba-Nd is added as a composite modification agent, the growth of primary Mg2Si phase is inhibited and its size becomes smaller because Nd and Ba atoms can bond to Si atoms prior to Mg atoms according to the calculated results of the stability of NdSi2, BaSi2, Ba2Si, NdSi and Mg2Si phases from the Miedema model.

References

1

Pan F S, Yang M B, Chen X H. Journal of Materials Science & Technology[J], 2016, 32(12): 1211 [Baidu Scholar] 

2

Spigarelli S, Cabibbo M, Evangelista E et al. Materials Science and Engineering[J], 2000, 289A(1-2): 172 [Baidu Scholar] 

3

Roodposhti P S, Sarkar A, Murty K L. Materials Science and Engineering[J], 2015, 626A: 195 [Baidu Scholar] 

4

Joost W J, Krajewski P E. Scripta Materialia[J], 2017, 128: [Baidu Scholar] 

107 [Baidu Scholar] 

5

Parrish A, Rais-Rohani M, Najafi A. International Journal of Crashworthiness[J], 2012, 17(3): 259 [Baidu Scholar] 

6

Luo A A. International Materials Reviews[J], 2004, 49(1): [Baidu Scholar] 

13 [Baidu Scholar] 

7

Pantelakis S G, Alexopoulos N D, Chamos A N. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology[J], 2007, 129: 422 [Baidu Scholar] 

8

Du J, Iwai K, Li W F et al. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China[J], 2009, 19(5): 1051 [Baidu Scholar] 

9

Bazhenov V E, Koltygin A V, Sung M C et al. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys[J], 2020, 8(1): 184 [Baidu Scholar] 

10

Xu C, Nakata T, Ho-ishi K et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2017, 139: 34 [Baidu Scholar] 

11

Luo A A, Pekguleryuz M O. Journal of Materials Science[J], 1994, 29(20): 5259 [Baidu Scholar] 

12

Li Dongsheng, Cheng Xiaonong. Materials Review[J], 2006, [Baidu Scholar] 

20(VI): 424 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

13

Han F Y, Wang P, Tian L H et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2013, 42(7): 1497 [Baidu Scholar] 

14

Li J L, Chen R S, Ma Y Q et al. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys[J], 2013, 1(4): 346 [Baidu Scholar] 

15

Milkereit B, Burgschat L, Kemsies R H et al. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys[J], 2019, 7(1): 1 [Baidu Scholar] 

16

Li C, Wu Y Y , Li H et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2011, 59(3): [Baidu Scholar] 

1058 [Baidu Scholar] 

17

Meng F B, Huang H J, Yuan X G et al. China Foundry[J], 2020, 17(1): 15 [Baidu Scholar] 

18

Wang Yanli, Guo Xuefeng, Huang Dan et al. Foundry Technology[J], 2011, 32(8): 1092 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

19

Liu Jie, Qi Wenjun, Deng Yun et al. Foundry Technology[J], 2011, 32(9): 1291 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

20

Jiang Q C, Wang H Y, Wang Y et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2005, 392(1-2): 130 [Baidu Scholar] 

21

Chen L, Wang H Y, Li Y J et al. CrystEngComm[J], 2014, [Baidu Scholar] 

16(3): 448 [Baidu Scholar] 

22

Qin Q D, Zhao Y G, Zhou W et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2007, 447(1-2): 186 [Baidu Scholar] 

23

Kou Shoupeng. Thesis for Master[D]. Changchun: Changchun University of Technology, 2016 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

24

Wang Yang, Zhang Xiuqing, Chen Ge et al. Hot Working Technology[J], 2013, 42(8): 163 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

25

Daneshifar M H, Papi A, Alishahi M. Materials Letters[J], 2021, 282: 128 832 [Baidu Scholar] 

26

Seth P P, Singh N, Singh M et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2020, 821: 153 205 [Baidu Scholar] 

27

Moussa M E, Waly M A, El-Sheikh A M. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys[J], 2014, 2(3): 230 [Baidu Scholar] 

28

Wang H Y, Zhu J N, Li J H et al. CrystEngComm[J], 2017, [Baidu Scholar] 

19(42): 6365 [Baidu Scholar] 

29

Hu B, Zhu W J, Li Z X et al. Journal of Magnesium and [Baidu Scholar] 

Alloys[J], 2021 [Baidu Scholar] 

30

Ghandvar H, Idris M H, Abu Bakar T A et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2020, 9(3): 3272 [Baidu Scholar] 

31

Wu X F, Zhang G G, Wu F F. Rare Metals[J], 2013, 32: 284 [Baidu Scholar] 

32

Ghandvar H, Jabbar K A, Idris M H et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2021, 11: 448 [Baidu Scholar] 

33

Xiao P, Gao Y, Mao P et al. Journal of Alloys and Com- [Baidu Scholar] 

pounds[J], 2021, 850: 156 877 [Baidu Scholar] 

34

Hu T, Wang F, Zheng R X et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2019, 796: 1 [Baidu Scholar] 

35

Cong M Q, Li Z Q, Liu J S et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2012, 539: 168 [Baidu Scholar] 

36

Zhang Jinshan, Gao Yibin, Pei Lixia et al. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals[J], 2006, 16(8): 1361 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

37

Han W D, Li Y H, Li X D et al. Applied Surface Science[J], 2020, 503: 144 331 [Baidu Scholar] 

38

Chen K, Li Z Q, Liu J S et al. Journal of Alloys and Com- pounds[J], 2009, 487(1-2): 293 [Baidu Scholar] 

39

Liangkishev H N, Guo Q W. Handbook of Phase Diagrams of Metal Binary Systems[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2009 [Baidu Scholar] 

40

Deboer F R, Boom R, Mattens W C M et al. Cohesion in [Baidu Scholar] 

Metals[M]. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988 [Baidu Scholar] 

41

Miedema A R, Chtel P F D, Boer F. Physica B+C[J], 1980, [Baidu Scholar] 

100(1): 1 [Baidu Scholar] 

42

Miedema A R. Journal of the Less Common Metals[J], 1973, [Baidu Scholar] 

32(1): 117 [Baidu Scholar] 

43

Wu Yufeng, Du Wenbo, Nie Zuoren. Acta Metallurgica [Baidu Scholar] 

Sinica[J], 2005, 42(5): 487 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

44

Yin Kexin, Wu Baolin, Wang Dapeng et al. Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University[J], 2015, 32(3): 25 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar] 

45

Hu J L, Tang C P, Zhang X M et al. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China[J], 2013, 23(11): 3161 [Baidu Scholar]