Abstract
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni lead-free solder alloy was used as the research object. Based on the unique structure, excellent physical properties, and good mechanical properties of graphene nanosheets (GNSs), the Ni modified GNSs (Ni-GNSs) were used as the reinforcement phase. The soldering process of Ni-GNSs reinforced SnAgCuRE system composite solder/Cu and thermal aging tests of soldering joints were conducted to investigate the effect of Ni-GNSs on the microstructure and thermal aging fracture mechanism of composite soldering joints. Results show that the addition of Ni-GNSs inhibits the linear expansion of the composite solder, resulting in lattice distortion and dislocation. The intermetallic compound (IMC) particles near the dislocation line interact with the dislocations and hinder their movement, thereby strengthening the composite solder and further improving the soldering joint. With a longer thermal aging time, the thickness of interface IMC layer is increased and the shear strength of soldering joints is decreased. Among them, the shear strength decrement of the composite soldering joints with 0.05wt% GNS addition is the least of only 8.9%. Moreover, after thermal aging for 384 h, its shear strength is still higher than that of the Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni/Cu soldering joint before thermal aging. With the addition of Ni-GNSs, the growth coefficient of interface IMC of composite soldering joints is significantly reduced, which effectively alleviates the degradation of mechanical properties of composite solder/Cu soldering joints during the thermal aging process, further changes the thermal aging fracture mechanism of composite solder/Cu soldering joints, and ultimately affects the reliability of joints. The fracture position of the Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni/Cu soldering joints moves from the soldering seam before thermal aging to the soldering seam/interface IMC, presenting the ductile-brittle mixed fracture. The fracture position of the Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.05GNSs/Cu soldering joints is still in the soldering seam zone, presenting the ductile fracture, which indicates the high reliability of the soldering joints.
With the improvement of microelectronic circuit integration, the number of soldering joints on the device is increased, and the size becomes smaller and smaller. The failure of soldering joints will affect the reliability of the device, which mainly depends on the environment and characteristics of the soldering joints. Among them, the influence of heat-mechanical action is more significant. Kim et a
Among the current lead-free solders, Sn-based lead-free solder has high fatigue resistance, good wettability, and weldability, therefore widely used in the microjoining fiel
In order to widen the application range of Sn5Sb-based materials, such as third-generation semiconductors, in higher-temperature package conditions, Xin et a
The addition of nano-carbon materials into the lead-free solder can effectively improve the mechanical properties of composite solder and soldering joint due to their fine grain strengthening, pinning, and bridging effect
The formation and microstructure evolution of IMC during the interface reaction between solder material and metal substrate have been widely researched, as well as IMC influence on the mechanical properties and subsequent service performance of soldering joint
In this research, the evolution of interface microstructure and mechanical properties of composite solder/Cu soldering joint during thermal aging were analyzed. The formation mechanism, growth dynamics of interface IMC, and failure fracture mechanism of soldering joint were discussed. Then, the mechanism of GNSs in the interface reaction and thermal aging process of composite solder/Cu soldering joint was revealed. The prevention measures for the thermal aging failure of microelectronic package interconnect soldering joints were discussed.
The test material was Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-xGNSs composite solders. According to the addition amount of GNS (0wt%, 0.01wt%, 0.03wt%, 0.05wt%, 0.07wt%, and 0.10wt%) in the composite solder and the composition of the solder matrix (Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni), nickel in the composite solder was added in the form of Ni-GNSs. The theoretical nickel loading in Ni-GNSs was calculated according to the amount of GNS added in the composite solder. The composite solder was prepared by mechanical alloying and rolled into a thin solder strip of 0.1 mm. The to-be-soldered surfaces of the thin solder strip and the Cu substrate were firstly polished with sandpaper and then washed by ultrasonic cleaning machine with acetone. After the removal of oil and oxide impurities on the surface, the composite solder was dried for subsequent use.
The thin strip solder was placed between the lap surfaces of the upper and lower Cu substrates for furnace soldering, as shown in

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of soldering joint
The soldering joint was placed in a box resistance furnace for thermal aging test. In order to avoid oxidation of the soldering joint, the sample of the soldering joint was placed in the molybdenum disulfide for thermal aging treatment according to the Japanese test method
The composite solder rod was cut into uniform sheets with the size of Φ8 mm×0.4 mm. Grind the solder sheets with 1200#–2000# sandpaper until the sheet thickness was about 120 μm. Then, punch the sheets into small wafers with the diam-eter of 3 mm and continuously grind them until the thickness was about 80 μm. MTP-1A type electrolysis double spray thinning instrument was used to thin the center thickness of the wafer (Φ3 mm). Then, the wafer was put into ethanol immediately for cleaning. Before the observation by transmis-sion electron microscope (TEM), the samples were thinned again with Gatan691 ion thinning instrument to ensure the clean surface. The interface morphology and microstructure of composite solder were characterized by JEM-2100 TEM.
Due to the irregular morphology of IMC layer at the interface of composite soldering joint, the area query method was used to measure the thickness of IMC layer in this research. Firstly, the area of the interface IMC layer was measured with ImageJ software, and then the thickness of the interface IMC layer was obtained by measuring the length. Additionally, ImageJ software was also used to measure the particle size of the interface IMC. A representative field of view was selected to measure the diameter of about 100 IMC particles, and their average value was used as the size of interface IMC particles.
The results in Ref.[

Fig.2 HRTEM images (a, d, g), SAED patterns (b, e, h), and EDS analysis (c, f, i) of Ni (a–c), Ag3Sn (d–f), and Cu6Sn5 (g–i) particles in composite solder containing 0.05wt% GNSs; HRTEM image of dislocation in composite solder (j); HRTEM image of Ni-GNSs/β-Sn interface (k); SAED pattern with EDS analysis of β-Sn (l)
Dislocation lines, dislocation walls, and IMC particles near the dislocation lines can also be observed in the composite solder, as shown in
Hence, the composite solder is mainly composed of β-Sn, Ag3Sn, and a small amount of Cu6Sn5, and defects, such as dislocation lines and dislocation walls, exist in the composite solder. Some IMC particles are distributed near the dislocation lines, which hinders the dislocation movement and streng-thens the composite solder. The interface of Ni-GNSs and solder alloy is well bonded, and no cracks and other defects can be observed.

Fig.3 Interface morphologies of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-xGNSs/Cu soldering joints containing 0wt% GNSs (a–d), 0.01wt% GNSs (e–h), and 0.10wt% GNSs (i–l) after thermal aging for 48 h (a, e, i), 96 h (b, f, j), 192 h (c, g, k), and 384 h (d, h, l)
Goldmann et a
When the GNS addition amount is 0.01wt%, the interface morphologies of the soldering joint during the thermal aging are shown in Fig.
The interface IMC morphologies of soldering joint with GNS addition of 0.03wt%–0.07wt% are shown in

Fig.4 Interface morphologies of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-xGNSs/Cu soldering joints containing 0.03wt% GNSs (a–d), 0.05wt% GNSs (e–h), and 0.07wt% GNSs (i–l) after thermal aging for 48 h (a, e, i), 96 h (b, f, j), 192 h (c, g, k), and 384 h (d, h, l)
With the thermal aging proceeding, the morphology of interface IMC is transformed from scallop-like and short-rod-like shapes to relatively flat lamellar shape, and some IMC Cu6Sn5 particles can be observed at the interface between Cu6Sn5 layer and soldering seam zone at the end of thermal aging, as shown in Fig.
Compared with
To further study the influence of GNSs on the growth of IMC particles during thermal aging process, the IMC particle size was measured by ImageJ software, as shown in

Fig.5 Morphologies (a–d, i–l) and grain diameters (e–h, m–p) of interface IMC grains in Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-xGNSs/Cu soldering joints containing 0wt% GNSs (a–h) and 0.05wt% GNSs (i–p) after thermal aging for 48 h (a, e, i, m), 96 h (b, f, j, n), 192 h (c, g, k, o), and 384 h (d, h, l, p)
With the prolongation of thermal aging time, the particle size of IMC is gradually increased, and the local grain fusion phenomenon appears. According to Oswald grain maturity theor
At the initial stage of thermal aging, the mutual diffusion coefficients of Cu and Sn atoms have a little difference, and no holes are generated at the Cu/Cu3Sn interface or IMC layer, as shown in
Compared with that of interface IMC without GNS addition, the particle size of interface IMC is significantly refined after 0.05wt% GNS addition. In addition to the scalloped IMC particles, a large number of prismatic IMC particles grow towards the soldering seam direction, the holes at the interface decrease, and the interface is rough, as shown in Fig.
According to the analysis of interface structure transforma-tion of soldering joint, the formation of interface IMC includes two stages: reaction and ripening. The first stage is the reaction stage, as shown in

Fig.6 Schematic diagrams of initial (a), middle (b), and end (c) reaction stage
At the initial reaction stage, the solder material is in direct contact with the Cu substrate and generates interface Cu6Sn5 IMC, as expressed by
6Cu+5Sn→Cu6Sn5 | (1) |
Cu6Sn5 grows towards the soldering seam side along the direction perpendicular to the Cu substrate. The growth rate of IMC is determined by the reaction rate. Choi et a
The growth of IMCs at the interface obstructs the direct contact between Sn and Cu substrate, and Cu atoms need to diffuse through the IMC layer to react with Sn. Therefore, the growth of interface IMC layer is mainly controlled by the diffusion reaction process, and its growth rate depends on the diffusion flux of Cu, as expressed by
JCu=DΔC/d | (2) |
where JCu is the flux diffused from Cu substrate to Sn; D is the diffusion coefficient of Cu; ΔC is the Cu concentration difference between Cu substrate and Cu solder; d is the thickness of IMC layer.
According to
According to the principle of minimum Gibbs free energy, small grains dissolve and large grains grow. Therefore, IMC enters the second stage, namely the ripening stage, as shown in

Fig.7 Schematic diagrams of ripening stage: (a) free energy-component relation curves; (b) grain consolidation and growth
The growth characteristics of interface IMC layer during thermal aging have an important influence on the reliability of soldering joints. Within the thermal aging duration in this research, the growth rate of IMC layer becomes slower due to the GNS addition into the composite solder, and the thickness of Cu3Sn layer is smaller than that of the Cu6Sn5 IMC layer. Therefore, the growth kinetics of the total interface IMC layer should be further analyzed and discussed. The variation curves of thickness of interface IMC layer with thermal aging time are shown in
x(t)=x0+(Dt | (3) |

Fig.8 Relationships between thickness of IMC layer in Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-xGNSs/Cu soldering joints and thermal aging time: (a, c) 0wt% GNSs, 0.01wt% GNSs, and 0.10wt% GNSs; (b, d) 0.03wt% GNSs, 0.05wt% GNSs, and 0.07wt% GNSs
where t is the thermal aging time; x(t) is the thickness of interface IMC layer after thermal aging for t time; x0 is the thickness of IMC layer before thermal aging; D is the IMC growth coefficient; n is the time exponent.
The n value of interface reaction between solder material and metal substrate is 0.33–0.70, and different n values indicate different growth mechanisms of interface IMC. For example, for parabolic growth with n value close to 0.5, the growth of interface IMC is mainly controlled by diffusio
In this research, the growth of interface IMC layer during thermal aging is mainly controlled by volume diffusion, i.e., the growth of interface IMC layer depends on the diffusion of Cu (Ni) and Sn atoms at the interface between solder material and Cu substrate. The growth of IMC layer at the interface obeys the time square root law, i.e., the n value in
Composite solder | Growth coefficient, D/×1 | Linearity, |
---|---|---|
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni | 6.00 | 0.94 |
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.01GNSs | 5.76 | 0.97 |
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.03GNSs | 1.93 | 0.93 |
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.05GNSs | 1.72 | 0.91 |
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.07GNSs | 1.99 | 0.87 |
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.1GNSs | 4.00 | 0.86 |
Based on
In order to investigate the coarsening mechanism of interface IMC grains during thermal aging, the relationships between particle sizes of interface IMC with thermal aging time are shown in

Fig.9 Relationships between particle size of interface IMC in Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-xGNSs/Cu soldering joints (x=0, 0.05) and thermal aging time
The power-law formula can also be used to describe the relationship between the coarsening behavior of interface IMC grains and the thermal aging time during the thermal aging process, as shown in
d(t)=d0+(Kt | (4) |
where t is aging time; d(t) is the particle size of interface IMC after thermal aging for t time; d0 is the particle size of interface IMC before aging; K is the grain growth coefficient of interface IMC; n is the time exponent.
According to FDR mode
Composite solder | Growth coefficient, K/ ×1 | Linearity, |
---|---|---|
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni | 1.9 | 0.996 |
Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.05GNSs | 0.48 | 0.993 |
There is a good linear correlation between IMC particle size and the cubic root of thermal aging time. The growth rate of Cu6Sn5 grains at the interface of composite solder with GNS addition is much slower than that at the interface of solder matrix, indicating that adding appropriate amount of GNS to the Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni solder can effectively inhibit the coarsening of interface IMC grains during the thermal aging process. The GNS addition is beneficial to improve the reliability of soldering joints.
The relationships between shear strength of soldering joints and thermal aging time are shown in

Fig.10 Relationship between shear strength and thermal aging time of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-xGNSs/Cu soldering joints
With the prolongation of thermal aging time, the grains of interface IMC are coarsened, presenting a parabolic law. The shear strength of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.05GNSs/Cu soldering joint is 29.53 MPa, which is higher than that of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni/Cu soldering joint by 23.5%. The main reason is that the uniform distribution of reinforcement phase particles inhibits the growth of IMC grains in the soldering seam and the solder. The fine IMC grains hinder the dislocation slip along the shear direction through the pinning effect. In addition, the thermal mismatch between reinfor-cement phase and solder matrix and the load transfer of reinforcement phase involved in Ref.[
According to
In order to further analyze the effect of GNS addition on the shear strength of soldering joints during the thermal aging process, the shear fracture morphologies of the soldering joint are shown in

Fig.11 Shear fracture morphologies of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni/Cu (a, c) and Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.05GNSs/Cu (b, d) soldering joints after thermal aging for 0 h (a–b) and 192 h (c–d)
The shear fracture of the Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni-0.05GNSs/Cu soldering joint presents the typical parabolic dimples (
The shear fracture of the composite soldering joint with 0.05wt% GNS addition after thermal aging for 192 h is composed of parabolic dimples and cleavage planes, as shown in
In conclusion, during the thermal aging process, the frac-ture position of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni/Cu soldering joint shifts from the soldering seam zone to the soldering seam/IMC layer, and the shear strength of the soldering joint de-creases greatly. The fracture locations of the soldering joint with 0.05wt% GNS addition are all in the soldering seam zone. Ni in the composite solder can hardly be ionized due to strong chemisorption with GNSs, and the surface active GNSs tend to be adsorbed by IMC particles, which inhibits the growth of IMC particles and thus inhibits the significant reduction in shear strength of the soldering joints during thermal aging.
1) SnAgCuRE system composite solder reinforced by Ni-GNSs is mainly composed of β-Sn, Ag3Sn, and a small amount of Cu6Sn5. The addition of Ni-GNSs inhibits the linear expansion of the composite solder, resulting in lattice distor-tion and dislocation. IMC particles near the dislocation line interact with the dislocation and hinder the dislocation move-ment, therefore strengthening the composite solder. Then, the composite soldering joint is also strengthened. The interface IMC of the composite soldering joint is pebble-like and rod-like. When GNS addition amount is 0.03wt%–0.07wt%, the thickness of the interface IMC layer is small, and the IMC grains and soldering seam microstructure are refined.
2) The thickness of IMC layer increases during the thermal aging, and Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni/Cu soldering joint has the largest thickness increment. The Cu3Sn IMC layer is obvious, and there are Kirkendall holes and micro-cracks at the IMC layer/Cu interface. The growth coefficients of IMC layer and IMC particles of composite soldering joints decrease significantly when GNS addition amount is 0.03wt%–0.07wt%, indicating that the growth of interface IMC is effectively inhibited by adding appropriate GNSs.
3) Adding an appropriate amount of GNS can effectively alleviate the decrease in mechanical properties of composite soldering joints during the thermal aging. The shear strength reduction of composite soldering joint with 0.05wt% GNS addition is the minimum of 8.9%. After thermal aging for 384 h, its shear strength is still higher than that of the Sn2.5Ag-0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni/Cu soldering joint before thermal aging. The fracture position of Sn2.5Ag0.7Cu0.1RE0.05Ni/Cu soldering joint shifts from the soldering seam zone to the soldering seam/IMC layer, whereas the fracture locations of the soldering joint with 0.05wt% GNS addition are all in the soldering seam zone, which suggests higher shear strength.
References
Kim K S, Huh S H, Suganuma K. Microelectron Reliability[J], 2003, 43(2): 259 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhong Y, Liu W, Wang C Q et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2016, 652: 264 [Baidu Scholar]
Kumar K M, Kripesh V, Tay A A O. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2008, 450: 229 [Baidu Scholar]
Xin M L, Wang X Q, Sun F L. Journal of Materials Science:Materials in Electronics[J], 2022, 33: 25025 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang L M, Lu X L, Mu G W. Materials Today Communica- tions[J], 2022, 32: 104025 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang W R, Ding Y, Liao M Q et al. Journal of Materials Science:Materials in Electronics[J], 2022, 33: 17137 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang B Y, Wu Y J, Wu W et al. Journal of Materials Science[J], 2022, 57: 17491 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang H G, Zhang K K, Wu Y J et al. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics[J], 2021, 32: 28695 [Baidu Scholar]
Jiang N, Zhang L, Xu K K et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2021, 50(7): 2293 [Baidu Scholar]
Han Y D, Jing H Y, Wang L X et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2015, 650: 475 [Baidu Scholar]
Jing H Y, Guo H J, Wang L X et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2017, 702: 669 [Baidu Scholar]
Park B G, Myung W R, Lee C J et al. Composites Part B[J], 2020, 182: 107617 [Baidu Scholar]
Aamir M, Muhammad R, Ahmed N et al. Microelectron Reliability[J], 2017, 78: 311 [Baidu Scholar]
Hu X W, Xu T, Jiang X X et al. Applied Physics A[J], 2016, 122: 278 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu T, Hu X W, Li J Y et al. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics[J], 2020, 31: 3876 [Baidu Scholar]
Liang S B, Ke C B, Huang J Q et al. Microelectron Reliabi- [Baidu Scholar]
lity[J], 2019, 92: 1 [Baidu Scholar]
Wan Y Q, Hu X W, Xu T et al. Microelectronic Engineering[J], 2018, 199: 69 [Baidu Scholar]
Suganuma K. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science[J], 2001, 5(1): 55 [Baidu Scholar]
Yoon D, Son Y W, Cheong H. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters[J], 2011, 11: 3227 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu X D, Han Y D, Jing H Y et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2013, 562: 25 [Baidu Scholar]
Pu C J, Li C J, Peng J B et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2023, 52(9): 3302 [Baidu Scholar]
Goldmann L S. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition[J], 1996, 15397: 169 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Man, Yu Zhishui, Zhang Peilei et al. Materials Reports[J], 2015, 29(23): 148 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Kim H K, Tu K N. Physical Review B[J], 1996, 53(23): 16027 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang H G, Zhang K K, Wu Y J et al. Materials & Design[J], 2021, 212: 110222 [Baidu Scholar]
Gusak A M, Chen C, Tu K N. Philosophical Magazine[J], 2016, 96(13): 1318 [Baidu Scholar]
Tao Q B, Benabou L, Vivet L et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2016, 669: 403 [Baidu Scholar]
Yoon J W, Lee C B, Kim D U et al. Metals and Materials International[J], 2003, 9: 193 [Baidu Scholar]
Li H L, An R, Wang C Q et al. Journal of Alloys and Com-pounds[J], 2015, 634: 94 [Baidu Scholar]
Kim D G, Jang H S, Kim J W et al. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics[J], 2005, 16: 603 [Baidu Scholar]
Choi S, Bieler T R, Lucas J P et al. Journal of Electronic Materials[J], 1999, 28: 1209 [Baidu Scholar]
Shen J, Zhao M L, He P P et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2013, 574: 451 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhou Minbo, Ma Xiao, Zhang Xinping. Acta Metallurgica Sinica[J], 2013, 49(3): 341 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Gusak A M, Tu K N. Physical Review B[J], 2002, 66: 115403 [Baidu Scholar]
Wu C D, Liu K W, Cheng P C. Applied Physics A[J], 2023, 129: 255 [Baidu Scholar]
Hu X W, Chen W J, Yu X et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2014, 600: 13 [Baidu Scholar]