Abstract
The corrosion properties of pure zirconium (Zr) with different grain sizes in acid, alkali, and salt environments were studied. The microstructures of pure Zr were observed by optical microscope, X-ray diffractometer, and electron backscattered diffraction probe. The corrosion resistance of pure Zr was analyzed by electrochemical corrosion test and immersion test. Results show that pure Zr with grain size of 4–32 μm can be obtained after annealing at 800 °C for different durations, and the relationship between grain size and annealing duration is
Zr is a very attractive metal in the nuclear industry due to its superior corrosion resistance, low thermal neutron absorption cross-sectional area, and good mechanical characteristic
With the emergence of ultrafine crystalline materials, more and more researches demonstrate that grain refinement can increase the corrosion resistanc
Although the effect of microstructure on the corrosion behavior of pure Zr has been well researched, the relationship between grain size and corrosion resistance is rarely discussed. The primary purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of grain size on the corrosion resistance of pure Zr under different environments.
The experiment material was a rolled pure Zr (≥99.5wt%) plate with thickness of 3 mm. The heat treatment of pure Zr plates was conducted in a vacuum tube furnace under protective environment with high purity argon (99.999%). The heat treatment temperature was 800 °C and the treatment duration was 0 (namely the untreated state), 2, 6, 10, 20, and 40 h. The heating rate of the vacuum tube furnace was 5 °C/min. After heat treatment, the samples were cooled to room temperature in the furnace.
The sample microstructures were observed by optical micro-scope (OM, Axiom Vert A1). For OM observation, the sam-ples were firstly cut into small pieces of 10 mm×10 mm× 3 mm by EDM wire cutter, then ground, polished, and finally etched by the mixed solution of hydrofluoric acid, nitric acid, and deionized water with volume ratio of HF:HNO3:H2O as 1:3:5. X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Davinci D8 Focus) was used to assess the physical phase composition of the samples with copper target Kα radiation and scanning range of 10°–90°. XRD samples were polished by 5000# silicon carbide sandpaper. The microstructures of the samples were further analyzed using electron backscattered diffractometer (EBSD, Oxford Symmetry), and the grain sizes and interfacial features of the samples were measured by AztecCrystal software. The grain size distribution data were fitted to lognormal and Gaussian distributions for analysis. The experiment voltage for EBSD test was 20 kV. EBSD test samples were ground, mechanically polished, and finally electrolytically polished. The electrolytic polishing solution was a mixed solution of 90vol% methanol and 10vol% perchloric acid, the operating voltage was about 20 V, and the operating current was about 2.6 A.
The electrochemical corrosion was measured by CHI660E electrochemical workstation equipped with three-electrode test equipment. The sample was served as the working electrode, the auxiliary electrode was a platinum electrode, and the reference electrode was the saturated calomel electrode. The area of the platinum electrode in solution was 20 mm×20 mm. The electrolytes were 3.5wt% NaCl solution in order to simulate the natural seawater environment, 5wt% HCl solution, 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution to simulate the common industrial environment. The open circuit potential (EOCP) tests were conducted for 1800 s, followed by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests in the frequency range of 1
Immersion tests were conducted in the 5 mol/L HCl solu-tion. The temperature of the immersion solution was room temperature (±3 °C). The mass change and surface morphol-ogy of samples were used to assess corrosion properties. The cube immersion samples (10 mm×10 mm×3 mm) were pre-pared according to the following methods. Firstly, the obser-vation side of EDM wire-cut sample was ground by 5000# silicon carbide sandpaper and the rest sides were ground by 1500# silicon carbide sandpaper. Secondly, the sample was ultrasonically cleaned with deionized water and anhydrous ethanol. During the immersion test (10 d), the samples were taken out every 2 d and cleaned ultrasonically with deionized water and anhydrous ethanol. Afterwards, the cleaned samples were weighed by electronic analytical balance. Finally, the samples were placed in a new immersion solution. Scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7100F) was used to study the surface morphology of the immersed samples.

Fig.1 XRD patterns of pure Zr after annealing for different durations with 2θ=10°–90° (a) and 2θ=20°–55° (b)
OM morphologies of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for different durations are shown in

Fig.2 OM morphologies of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for 0 h (a), 2 h (b), 6 h (c), 10 h (d), 20 h (e), and 40 h (f); EDS analysis results of untreated pure Zr (g); EDS element distributions of Zr (h) and Hf (i) in untreated pure Zr

Fig.3 IPFs of grain orientations in pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for 0 h (a), 2 h (b), 6 h (c), 10 h (d), 20 h (e), and 40 h (f)

Fig.4 Antipodal plots for EBSD analysis of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for 0 h (a), 2 h (b), 6 h (c), 10 h (d), 20 h (e), and 40 h (f)

Fig.5 PFs for EBSD analysis of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for 0 h (a), 2 h (b), 6 h (c), 10 h (d), 20 h (e), and 40 h (f)

Fig.6 Grain size distributions of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for 0 h (a), 2 h (b), 6 h (c), 10 h (d), 20 h (e), and 40 h (f)
Duration/h | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 20 | 40 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAGB/% | 94.1 | 91.5 | 91.1 | 90.3 | 93.4 | 93.6 |
LAGB/% | 5.94 | 8.54 | 8.87 | 9.72 | 6.58 | 6.37 |
(1) |

Fig.7 Relationship of average grain size with annealing duration (a) and ln(dD/dt)-lnD (b)
where D is the average grain size of samples after annealing at 800 °C for different durations; t is annealing duration; n and k are constants. According to the linear fitting analysis of
(2) |
where D0 is the grain size of untreated Zr.
The electrochemical corrosion characteristics of samples with different grain sizes were investigated through the tests in 5wt% HCl, 0.1 mol/L NaOH, and 3.5wt% NaCl solutions. Firstly, open circuit potential (OCP) test was performed on the sample with the typical three-electrode system.

Fig.8 Electrochemical test results of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for different durations in 5wt% HCl solution: (a) OCP curves; (b) potential polarization curves; (c) relationships between corrosion current density and grain size; (d) Nyquist plots; (e) Bode impedance plots; (f) schematic diagram of equivalent circuit model
Parameter | Solution | 0 h | 2 h | 6 h | 10 h | 20 h | 40 h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corrosion potential, Ecorr/mV | 3.5wt% NaCl | -636±08 | -484±32 | -406±15 | -683±31 | -675±24 | -787±46 |
0.1 mol/L NaOH | -527±26 | -217±06 | -360±35 | -622±11 | -567±15 | -588±31 | |
5wt% HCl | -293±23 | -290±63 | -343±21 | -287±49 | -449±43 | -359±09 | |
Corrosion current density, icorr/ ×1 | 3.5wt% NaCl | 0.33±0.07 | 0.46±0.07 | 0.62±0.25 | 0.29±0.10 | 0.23±0.43 | 0.87±0.39 |
0.1 mol/L NaOH | 0.57±0.17 | 16.14±6.37 | 2.24±1.13 | 0.32±0.43 | 0.23±1.97 | 0.32±0.13 | |
5wt% HCl | 7.43±3.21 | 6.32±3.10 | 7.04±3.66 | 8.84±3.69 | 1.17±0.98 | 1.12±3.23 |
Electrochemical impedance test was conducted to discuss the properties of passivation film on the metal surface and the electrochemical characteristics of the system. Fig.
Since Nyquist plot shows a single time constant capacitive resistance arc and the curve deviates slightly from a semicircle, a constant phase angle element (CPE) is used instead of the ideal capacitor and it is fitted using the equivalent circuit model, as shown in
(3) |
where Y0 represents the true capacitance of CPE in
(4) |
where fm denotes the frequency at which the imaginary portion of the impedance plot reaches the highest value. EIS data fitted by the equivalent circuit diagram with the effective capacitance value (Ceff) are presented in
(5) |
Solution | Annealing duration/h | Rs/Ω⋅c | Y0/×1 | Ceff/×1 | n | Rp/MΩ·c | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5wt% NaCl | 0 | 14.64±0.37 | 1.12±0.17 | 1.44±0.33 | 0.95±0.01 | 39.58±1.29 | 0.77±1.50 |
2 | 15.75±4.30 | 1.27±0.10 | 1.57±0.17 | 0.95±0.01 | 4.65±2.19 | 2.57±0.76 | |
6 | 15.91±0.80 | 1.86±0.29 | 2.87±0.64 | 0.91±0.03 | 6.77±1.59 | 8.22±3.49 | |
10 | 15.60±1.25 | 1.37±0.16 | 1.66±0.17 | 0.96±0.03 | 12.31±5.08 | 1.91±0.77 | |
20 | 15.88±1.08 | 1.03±0.70 | 1.41±1.74 | 0.93±0.05 | 13.3±6.46 | 1.44±3.27 | |
40 | 16.07±1.17 | 1.25±0.05 | 1.74±0.08 | 0.93±0.01 | 6.69±3.39 | 1.16±0.52 | |
5wt% HCl | 0 | 2.75±0.82 | 1.48±4.13 | 1.91±0.78 | 0.94±0.06 | 1.05±0.97 | 2.45±0.32 |
2 | 5.59±2.83 | 1.23±0.78 | 1.47±0.80 | 0.96±0.30 | 1.75±3.30 | 1.50±0.14 | |
6 | 2.13±1.75 | 1.37±1.04 | 1.67±1.51 | 0.96±0.18 | 5.84±0.33 | 1.18±0.04 | |
10 | 5.13±1.87 | 1.06±1.29 | 1.33±3.77 | 0.95±0.03 | 0.56±0.32 | 3.87±1.39 | |
20 | 4.28±1.09 | 2.41±0.44 | 3.66±0.79 | 0.91±0.04 | 1.80±3.19 | 4.07±1.53 | |
40 | 3.23±1.77 | 1.37±0.54 | 1.66±1.76 | 0.96±0.06 | 1.41±0.29 | 3.34±0.35 | |
0.1 mol/L NaOH | 0 | 44.77±3.77 | 1.17±0.41 | 1.61±1.20 | 0.93±0.04 | 0.67±1.17 | 3.48±0.02 |
2 | 51.76±7.21 | 1.69±0.25 | 2.57±0.24 | 0.91±0.02 | 0.01±0.002 | 8.89±2.67 | |
6 | 40.12±6.23 | 1.16±0.23 | 1.40±0.55 | 0.96±0.03 | 3.29±0.10 | 3.09±1.53 | |
10 | 41.04±3.12 | 0.95±0.84 | 1.26±3.15 | 0.94±0.08 | 1.03±1.27 | 2.59±0.01 | |
20 | 45.63±3.28 | 0.95±0.63 | 1.20±2.18 | 0.95±0.08 | 5.71±2.43 | 3.57±0.01 | |
40 | 57.06±5.66 | 1.18±0.07 | 1.91±0.24 | 0.90±0.02 | 5.44±0.94 | 4.40±0.61 |
where ε and ε0 represent the dielectric constant of the oxide film and the vacuum dielectric constant, respectively; A is the area of 1 c
Solution | 0 h | 2 h | 6 h | 10 h | 20 h | 40 h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5wt% NaCl | 1.599 | 1.466 | 0.802 | 1.387 | 1.633 | 1.323 |
5wt% HCl | 1.205 | 1.566 | 1.378 | 1.730 | 0.629 | 1.387 |
0.1 mol/L NaOH | 1.430 | 0.896 | 1.644 | 1.827 | 1.918 | 1.205 |

Fig.9 Electrochemical test results of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for different durations in 3.5wt% NaCl solution: (a) OCP curves; (b) potential polarization curves; (c) relationships between corrosion current density and grain size; (d) Nyquist plots; (e) Bode impedance plots; (f) schematic diagram of equivalent circuit model
On the one hand, as shown in
On the other hand, during the annealing process, the change in grain size is accompanied by the change in grain orientation. According to Ref.[
Fig.

Fig.10 Electrochemical test results of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for different durations in 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution: (a) OCP curves; (b) potential polarization curves; (c) relationships between corrosion current density and grain size; (d‒e) Nyquist plots; (f) Bode imped-ance plots; (g) schematic diagram of equivalent circuit model
Fig.
Fig.
M+aC | (6) |

Fig.11 SEM images of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for different durations followed by immersion in 5 mol/L HCl solution at 25 °C for 10 d: (a) 0 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 6 h, (d) 10 h, (e) 20 h, and (f) 40 h; relationship between sample mass and exposure time (g); number of pitting pits in different samples after immersion for 10 d (h)
where a and b are constants; M stands for the metal element.
In order to further analyze the effect of grain size on the corrosion resistance of pure Zr, the corrosion morphology of the sample surface after the polarization test in 5wt% HCl solution was investigated by white light interferometer. 2D and 3D morphologies of the pitting pits on the sample surface are given in

Fig.12 2D morphologies (a, d, g, j, m, p), 3D morphologies (b, e, h, k, n, q), and depth contours (c, f, i, l, o, r) of pitting corrosion of pure Zr after annealing at 800 °C for different durations followed by immersion in 5 mol/L HCl solution at 25 °C for 10 d: (a–c) 0 h, (d–f) 2 h, (g–i) 6 h, (j–l) 10 h, (m–o) 20 h, and (p–r) 40 h
1) The pure Zr after annealing for different durations is composed of equiaxed α-Zr.
2) The grain size of pure Zr ranges from 4 μm to 32 μm. With the increase in grain size, the grain orientation and grain boundary orientation of pure Zr also change. The material exhibits a (0001)//normal direction texture and the sample annealed for 20 h has the highest texture strength.
3) The corrosion resistance of pure Zr is initially decreased, then increased, and subsequently decreased with the increase in grain size. Pure Zr with grain size of approximately 24 μm exhibits the optimal corrosion resistance. The variation in corrosion resistance primarily results in the differences in corrosion current density and immersion pitting.
4) The corrosion behavior of pure Zr is influenced by the combined effects of grain size and texture. Pure Zr with the grain size of approximately 24 μm has the highest degree of orientation strength and forms the thickest oxide film. The enhanced passivation film thickness correlates to the improved corrosion resistance.
References
Li F, Lin C, Shi Y H et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineer-ing[J], 2022, 51(3): 866 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang X Z, Wang Y, Wang Y X et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2023, 219: 111226 [Baidu Scholar]
Qi B Y, Liu C Z, Yang Q H et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering[J], 2022, 51(12): 4483 [Baidu Scholar]
Yokoyama K, Yamada D, Sakai J. Corrosion Science[J], 2013, 73: 375 [Baidu Scholar]
Zhang X S, Tong S H, Huang D L et al. Coordination Chemistry Reviews[J], 2021, 448: 214177 [Baidu Scholar]
Zheng H Q, Zeng Y N, Chen J et al. Inorganic Chemistry[J], 2019, 58(10): 6983 [Baidu Scholar]
Fattah-Alhosseini A, Chaharmahali R, Keshavarz M K et al. Surfaces and Interfaces[J], 2021, 25: 101283 [Baidu Scholar]
Mehjabeen A, Song T T, Xu W et al. Advanced Engineering Materials[J], 2018, 20(9): 1800207 [Baidu Scholar]
Balasubramanian N, Langdon T G. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2016, 47: 5827 [Baidu Scholar]
Balyanov A J, Kutnyakova N, Amirkhanova A et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2004, 51(3): 225 [Baidu Scholar]
Gu Y X, Jiang J H, Ma A B et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology[J], 2021, 15: 1873 [Baidu Scholar]
Attarilar S, Djavanroodi F, Irfan O M et al. Results in Phys- ics[J], 2020, 17: 103141 [Baidu Scholar]
Braga D P, Magalhães D C C, Kliauga A M et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2020, 773: 138865 [Baidu Scholar]
Ralston K D, Birbilis N. Corrosion[J], 2010, 66(7): 07500 [Baidu Scholar]
Nie M Y, Wang C T, Qu M H et al. Journal of Materials Sci- ence[J], 2014, 49: 2824 [Baidu Scholar]
Robson J D. Journal of Nuclear Materials[J], 2019, 527: 151814 [Baidu Scholar]
Sahoo S K, Panda S, Sabat R K et al. Philosophical Maga- [Baidu Scholar]
zine[J], 2015, 95(10): 1105 [Baidu Scholar]
Ghosh A, Singh A, Gurao N P. Materials Characteriza- [Baidu Scholar]
tion[J], 2017, 125: 83 [Baidu Scholar]
Kim H S, Kim W J. Corrosion Science[J], 2014, 89: 331 [Baidu Scholar]
Ding Yumiao, Liu Shuguang, Xia Chaoqun et al. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2021, 423: 127576 [Baidu Scholar]
Sun S, Zai W, Chen Y et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2022, 839: 142802 [Baidu Scholar]
Miao Qing, Hu Lianxi, Wang Xin et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2010, 493(1–2): 87 [Baidu Scholar]
Li Qiang, Chen Kai, Xia Chaoqun et al. Materials Science and Engineering A[J], 2021, 817: 141358 [Baidu Scholar]
Xu W, Lu X, Wang L N et al. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials[J], 2018, 88: 534 [Baidu Scholar]
Feng Z H, Dong H C, Kang J et al. Materials Science and Engineering C[J], 2019, 101: 92 [Baidu Scholar]
Su B X, Luo L S, Wang B B et al. Journal of Materials Science and Technology[J], 2021, 62: 234 [Baidu Scholar]
Khan M M, Shabib I, Haider W. Scripta Materialia[J], 2019, 162: 223 [Baidu Scholar]
Kim W G, Choe H C. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China[J], 2009, 19(4): 1005 [Baidu Scholar]
Yang Y H, Xia C Q, Feng Z H et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2015, 101: 56 [Baidu Scholar]
Song T S, Xia C Q, Ding Y M et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2022, 208: 110685 [Baidu Scholar]
Jiang Z L, Dai X, Norby T et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2011, [Baidu Scholar]
53(2): 815 [Baidu Scholar]
Bolat G, Izquierdo J, Santana J J et al. Electrochimica [Baidu Scholar]
Acta[J], 2013, 88: 447 [Baidu Scholar]
Quintero D, Galvis O, Calderón J A et al. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2014, 258: 1223 [Baidu Scholar]
Eidivandi S, Shayegh B B, Dustmohammadi A et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds[J], 2020, 821: 153253 [Baidu Scholar]
Kuczyńska-Zemła D, Sotniczuk A, Pisarek M et al. Surface and Coatings Technology[J], 2021, 418: 127219 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Z B, Hu H X, Liu C B et al. Electrochimica Acta[J], 2014, 135: 526 [Baidu Scholar]
Wang Y H, Li X, Alexandrov I V et al. Materials[J], 2020, [Baidu Scholar]
13(22): 5117 [Baidu Scholar]
Gebert A, Gostin P F, Uhlemann M et al. Acta Materialia[J], 2012, 60(5): 2300 [Baidu Scholar]
Orłowska M, Ura-Bińczyk E, Adamczyk-Cieślak B et al. Journal of Materials Science[J], 2021, 56: 16726 [Baidu Scholar]
Sotniczuk A, Chromiński W, Adamczyk-Cieślak B et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2022, 200: 110238 [Baidu Scholar]
Liu M, Qiu D, Zhao M C et al. Scripta Materialia[J], 2008, [Baidu Scholar]
58(5): 421 [Baidu Scholar]
Xia C Q, Feng Z H, Liu S G et al. Corrosion Science[J], 2017, 127: 39 [Baidu Scholar]
Soltis J. Corrosion Science[J], 2015, 90: 5 [Baidu Scholar]
Yasuda M, Weinberg F, Tromans D. Journal of the Electrochemical Society[J], 1990, 137(12): 3708 [Baidu Scholar]
Hornkjøl S. Electrochimica Acta[J], 1988, 33(2): 289 [Baidu Scholar]
Gurao N P, Manivasagam G, Govindaraj P et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A[J], 2013, 44: 5602 [Baidu Scholar]
Lv Xiaodan, Liu Bin, Liu Yan et al. Materials China[J], 2022, 41(6): 477 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]
Wu Junyu, Xu Jianping, Liu Houlong et al. Titanium Industry Progress[J], 2023, 40(4): 13 (in Chinese) [Baidu Scholar]